Avoid Global State — How to Design Stateless Components
Stop Breaking Your Components: The Stateless Architecture Guide
Celebrate 15h of August with 35% off on our paid subscription — EXPRIRING today !!
Hello guys, Global state is one of the most common pitfalls in modern application development. At first glance, using global variables or shared mutable state seems like a quick way to “store and access data from anywhere.”
But over time, this approach leads to brittle code, unexpected bugs, and reduced maintainability.
Instead, a better strategy is to design stateless components—units of code that don’t rely on global variables and instead depend only on explicit inputs (props, parameters, or context passed intentionally).
In the past, I have shared many tried and tested coding tips like:
Avoid Deep Nesting — How to Flatten Your Code with Early Returns
Why Your Hard-Coded Dependencies Are Killing Your Code Quality
In this post, we’ll explore why avoiding global state matters, how to design stateless components, and how AI-powered tools like CodeRabbit can even help you refactor toward cleaner, stateless design.
The Problem with Global State
Global state introduces hidden dependencies. When multiple components read from or write to the same global variable, it becomes almost impossible to track where changes are happening.
This leads to:
Tight Coupling: Components become dependent on hidden external variables.
Reduced Reusability: You can’t reuse a component elsewhere without dragging along its global dependencies.
Harder Testing: Unit tests break because components depend on an implicit environment.
Concurrency Issues: In multi-threaded or async environments, race conditions become a nightmare.
Before: Component with Global State
Here’s an example in React using a global variable:
At first, this seems fine. But now, any change to theme
in one part of the app affects all other components, and testing ThemeButton
requires mocking or resetting theme
.
After: Stateless Component with Props
Instead of relying on a global variable, we make the component stateless by passing data as props:
Now, ThemeButton
is pure—its output depends only on its inputs. You can reuse it across the app, easily test it by passing in mock props, and even render multiple variants side by side.
Why Stateless is Better
Predictability: Stateless components are easier to reason about—given the same inputs, they always produce the same output.
Testability: You can test them in isolation without mocking global variables.
Reusability: Stateless design makes components portable across projects and contexts.
Maintainability: When requirements change, updates are easier because dependencies are explicit.
Scalability: Stateless design aligns with distributed and serverless architectures where state is externalized to databases, APIs, or dedicated state managers.
Beyond UI: Stateless Design in APIs
Statelessness isn’t just for UI components—it’s also the foundation of REST APIs and serverless functions.
By avoiding server-side session state, APIs become more scalable and fault-tolerant, because each request can be handled independently.
Java Example: Avoiding Global State in Backend Design
Just like in React, global state in Java applications (via static variables or shared mutable objects) can quickly lead to bugs, tight coupling, and difficult testing.
Instead, we should design components that are stateless and rely on dependency injection or immutable objects.
❌ Bad Example — Using Global State with static
public class UserService {
private static int userCount = 0; // global mutable state
public void addUser(String name) {
userCount++;
System.out.println("User added: " + name);
}
public int getUserCount() {
return userCount;
}
}
Here,
userCount
is a shared global state.If multiple threads access this service (e.g., in a Spring Boot app), it can lead to race conditions.
It also makes unit testing harder, since the global variable retains state between tests.
✅ Good Example — Stateless with Dependency Injection
public class UserService {
private final UserRepository repository;
public UserService(UserRepository repository) {
this.repository = repository; // injected dependency
}
public void addUser(String name) {
repository.save(new User(name));
System.out.println("User added: " + name);
}
public long getUserCount() {
return repository.count();
}
}
No
static
or global mutable variables.Each instance of
UserService
depends on aUserRepository
.This makes it thread-safe, testable, and scalable.
In frameworks like Spring, dependency injection handles lifecycle and ensures statelessness.
🔍 Insight: Why Stateless is Better in Java
Thread-Safety → Stateless services avoid concurrency issues.
Testability → Each test runs with a fresh instance, no leftover state.
Scalability → Stateless services are easier to distribute across multiple servers.
Maintainability → Clear separation of concerns instead of hiding data in static fields.
How AI Tools Like CodeRabbit Can Help
Refactoring a legacy codebase full of global state can feel overwhelming. That’s where AI coding assistants like CodeRabbit shine. They can:
Detect hidden global state dependencies in your code.
Suggest stateless alternatives with props, context, or dependency injection.
Auto-generate tests for your new stateless components.
Help you enforce consistent design patterns across your project.
For teams modernizing legacy applications, leveraging AI-powered reviews can drastically speed up the move toward stateless, modular architecture.
Conclusion
Global state may seem convenient in the short term, but it creates hidden complexity that grows over time. By embracing stateless components, you make your codebase more predictable, testable, and maintainable.
Whether you’re building React apps, APIs, or microservices, designing for statelessness is a long-term investment in scalability and reliability.
And with tools like CodeRabbit, moving away from global state has never been easier—AI can help you spot issues, refactor code, and maintain best practices so you can focus on building value, not fighting bugs.
Celebrate 15h of August with 35% off on our paid subscription — EXPRIRING today !!
Other AI, System Design, and Clean Code Articles you may like
I use a lot utilities (classes whose methods are all statics) inside my Java classes (i. e.: StringUtil, DateUtil and whatnot). Should this practice be avoided in favour of ID?
They are helpers that don't affect to my code, they only transform the input to generate useful output for my logic. Are they fine?
Loved the explanation, its very helpful to have the examples that show how avoiding global state in code can make code more maintainable and less prone to bugs!